1919th Authentication - Revision history

Codesuser: /* B-1. Overview. */

2026-09-08T07:56:50Z

B-1. Overview.

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:56, 8 September 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	==== '''B-1. Overview.''' ====		==== '''B-1. Overview.''' ====
	* Just such a document could be found in the Archive titled as "'''DRAFT CODE ON OBLIGATIONS, VI'''" ('''[https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:163427 Vol.35, ID=163427]'''). It was a report submitted to the "Commission of Codification" and collected in the Archive under the ~~heading~~:		* Just such a document could be found in the Archive titled "'''DRAFT CODE ON OBLIGATIONS, VI'''" ('''[https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:163427 Vol.35, ID=163427]'''). It was a report submitted to the "Commission of Codification" and collected in the Archive under the category:
	** "'''III. Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II (October 1921 – December 1922) and appointment by the King of a Revising Committee (June 1922''')".		** "'''III. Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II (October 1921 – December 1922) and appointment by the King of a Revising Committee (June 1922''')".
	* It has the following title and other attributes:		* It has the following title and other attributes:

Codesuser: /* B. Report of 19th October 1921 written by Mr. Guyon. */

2026-09-08T06:25:14Z

B. Report of 19th October 1921 written by Mr. Guyon.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:25, 8 September 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	==== '''B-1. Overview.''' ====		==== '''B-1. Overview.''' ====
	* Just such a document could be found in the Archive titled as "'''DRAFT CODE ON OBLIGATIONS, VI'''" ('''[https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:163427 Vol.35, ID=163427]'''). It was a report submitted to the "Commission of Codification" and collected under the heading:		* Just such a document could be found in the Archive titled as "'''DRAFT CODE ON OBLIGATIONS, VI'''" ('''[https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:163427 Vol.35, ID=163427]'''). It was a report submitted to the "Commission of Codification" and collected in the Archive under the heading:
	** "'''III. Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II (October 1921 – December 1922) and appointment by the King of a Revising Committee (June 1922''')".		** "'''III. Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II (October 1921 – December 1922) and appointment by the King of a Revising Committee (June 1922''')".
	* It has the following title and other attributes:		* It has the following title and other attributes:
	** Title: "'''~~ALTERATION~~ TO THE DRAFT CODE OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 BEFORE PROMULGATION, First Part: GENERAL (Sections 1 to 387)'''"		** Title: "'''ALTERATIONS TO THE DRAFT CODE OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 BEFORE PROMULGATION, First Part: GENERAL (Sections 1 to 387)'''"
	** Dated: 18th and 19th October 1921.		** Dated: 18th and 19th October 1921.
	** Items: 73 entries.		** Items: 73 entries.

Codesuser: /* B-3. Epilogue: Postponement of the Promulgation. */

2026-09-07T12:59:06Z

B-3. Epilogue: Postponement of the Promulgation.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:59, 7 September 2026
Line 33:		Line 33:
	* According to another document "'''Note to be communicated to the newspapers at the time when the civil and commercial code will be promulgated'''" dated March 1922 ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P249.pdf Vol.35, P. 35/249]), the promulgation of the Books I and II was scheduled to 1st April 1922 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2465), they should be then put into effect on 1st April 1923 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2466). On 21st March 1922, Mr. ''Guyon'' submitted <u>''the Thai translation of the Books I and II''</u> to the President of the Commission of Codification, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja (เจ้าะระยาอภัยราชา)''.		* According to another document "'''Note to be communicated to the newspapers at the time when the civil and commercial code will be promulgated'''" dated March 1922 ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P249.pdf Vol.35, P. 35/249]), the promulgation of the Books I and II was scheduled to 1st April 1922 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2465), they should be then put into effect on 1st April 1923 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2466). On 21st March 1922, Mr. ''Guyon'' submitted <u>''the Thai translation of the Books I and II''</u> to the President of the Commission of Codification, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja (เจ้าะระยาอภัยราชา)''.
	* However, the scheduled promulgation was delayed. On 16th June 1922, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja'' wrote to Mr. ''Guyon;'' "[King] had once more gone through the Draft Preamble and the translation of the 387 sections of the Civil and Commercial Code which are to be promulgated and deemed that <u>''the wording and the translation are not quite perfect''</u> (ข้อความและคำแปลยังไม่สู้บริบูรญ์เรียบร้อยดี) …". The scheduled promulgation was suspended. Instead, the King appointed a new "Revising Committee" ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P250-255.pdf Vol.35, P.35/250-255]).		* However, the scheduled promulgation was delayed. On 16th June 1922, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja'' wrote to Mr. ''Guyon;'' "[King] had once more gone through the Draft Preamble and the translation of the 387 sections of the Civil and Commercial Code which are to be promulgated and deemed that <u>''the wording and the translation are not quite perfect''</u> (ข้อความและคำแปลยังไม่สู้บริบูรญ์เรียบร้อยดี) …". The scheduled promulgation was suspended. Instead, the King appointed a new "Revising Committee" ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P250-255.pdf Vol.35, P.35/250-255]).
	* In the course of the newly started revising work, on 16th October 1922, the Commission of Codification decided to integrate the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" into the Book I ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol036/Vol036_P075-077.pdf Vol.36, P.36/075-077]). As a result, the volume of the Book I increased from 39 to 105 sections, and the sections of the Book II were renumbered from the range of 40 – 387 to 106 – 452.		* In the course of the newly started revising work, on 16th October 1922, the Commission of Codification decided to integrate the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" into the Book I ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol036/Vol036_P075-077.pdf Vol.36, P.36/075-077]). In March 1922, the Revising Committee adopted the new sections 39 — 105 ([https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:163429 Vol.37, P.37/194 — 213]). As a result, the volume of the Book I increased from 39 to 105 sections, and the sections of the Book II were renumbered from the range of 40 – 387 to 106 – 452.

	=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===		=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===

Codesuser at 09:40, 3 September 2026

2026-09-03T09:40:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 3 September 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	* Before the scheduled promulgation of the Books I and II, the French commissioners summarized all the alterations and improvements to the original text of the Draft 1919. This is the contents of the report. Its original text including ANNEXs I and II is as follows:		* Before the scheduled promulgation of the Books I and II, the French commissioners summarized all the alterations and improvements to the original text of the Draft 1919. This is the contents of the report. Its original text including ANNEXs I and II is as follows:

	<p style="margin-left:50px;"><font style='font-weight:bold; color:maroon'>Please, refer to [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P171-215.pdf The Letter and the Report of 19. October 1921 ~~submitted by Mr. Guiyon~~.] 》</font></p>		<p style="margin-left:50px;"><font style='font-size:18px; font-weight:bold; color:maroon'>Please, refer to [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P171-215.pdf The Letter and the Report of 19. October 1921.] 》</font></p>

	==== '''B-2. Comparison for Authentication.''' ====		==== '''B-2. Comparison for Authentication.''' ====
	* Fortunately, we can find exactly corresponding alterations and corrections in our copy of the Draft 1919 for most of these entries; 6 entries of them were not documented in our copy yet. In this way, the result of the comparison is quite positive for the authentication of the copy of the Draft 1919 as described below in '''[[1919th Authentication#C-3. Entries:\|C-3. Entries]]'''. Its PDF version is also available as follows:		* Fortunately, we can find exactly corresponding alterations and corrections in our copy of the Draft 1919 for most of these entries; 6 entries of them were not documented in our copy yet. In this way, the result of the comparison is quite positive for the authentication of the copy of the Draft 1919 as described below in '''[[1919th Authentication#C-3. Entries:\|C-3. Entries]]'''. Its PDF version is also available as follows:

	<p style="margin-left:50px;"><font style='font-weight:bold; color:maroon'>Please, refer to [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_authentication.pdf The Comparison Result for Authentication in PDF.] 》</font></p>		<p style="margin-left:50px;"><font style='font-size:18px; font-weight:bold; color:maroon'>Please, refer to [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_authentication.pdf The Comparison Result for Authentication in PDF.] 》</font></p>

	==== '''B-3. Epilogue: Postponement of the Promulgation.''' ====		==== '''B-3. Epilogue: Postponement of the Promulgation.''' ====

Codesuser: /* DRAFT: CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL CODE FOR KINGDOM OF SIAM. (1919) */

2026-09-03T09:24:16Z

DRAFT: CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL CODE FOR KINGDOM OF SIAM. (1919)

Codesuser at 16:11, 2 September 2026

2026-09-02T16:11:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 2 September 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	==== '''B-1. Overview.''' ====		==== '''B-1. Overview.''' ====
	* Just a ~~such~~ document could be found in the Archive titled as "'''DRAFT CODE ON OBLIGATIONS, VI'''" ('''[https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:163427 Vol.35, ID=163427]'''). It was a report submitted to the "Commission of Codification" and collected under the heading:		* Just such a document could be found in the Archive titled as "'''DRAFT CODE ON OBLIGATIONS, VI'''" ('''[https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:163427 Vol.35, ID=163427]'''). It was a report submitted to the "Commission of Codification" and collected under the heading:
	** "'''III. Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II (October 1921 – December 1922) and appointment by the King of a Revising Committee (June 1922''')".		** "'''III. Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II (October 1921 – December 1922) and appointment by the King of a Revising Committee (June 1922''')".
	* It has the following title and other attributes:		* It has the following title and other attributes:

Codesuser: /* B-3. Epilogue. */

2026-09-02T15:59:09Z

B-3. Epilogue.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 2 September 2026
Line 32:		Line 32:
	* The circumstances of the report suggest that <u>''our copy of the Draft 1919 show its stand shortly before the submission of the just named report "ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 ..." on 19th October 1921''</u>.		* The circumstances of the report suggest that <u>''our copy of the Draft 1919 show its stand shortly before the submission of the just named report "ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 ..." on 19th October 1921''</u>.
	* According to another document "'''Note to be communicated to the newspapers at the time when the civil and commercial code will be promulgated'''" dated March 1922 ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P249.pdf Vol.35, P. 35/249]), the promulgation of the Books I and II was scheduled to 1st April 1922 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2465), they should be then put into effect on 1st April 1923 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2466). On 21st March 1922, Mr. ''Guyon'' submitted the Thai translation of the Books I and II to the President of the Commission of Codification, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja (เจ้าะระยาอภัยราชา)''.		* According to another document "'''Note to be communicated to the newspapers at the time when the civil and commercial code will be promulgated'''" dated March 1922 ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P249.pdf Vol.35, P. 35/249]), the promulgation of the Books I and II was scheduled to 1st April 1922 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2465), they should be then put into effect on 1st April 1923 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2466). On 21st March 1922, Mr. ''Guyon'' submitted the Thai translation of the Books I and II to the President of the Commission of Codification, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja (เจ้าะระยาอภัยราชา)''.
	* However, the scheduled promulgation was delayed. On 16th June 1922, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja'' wrote to Mr. ''Guyon;'' "[King] had once more gone through the Draft Preamble and the translation of the 387 sections of the Civil and Commercial Code which are to be promulgated and deemed that <u>''the wording and the translation are not quite perfect''</u> (ข้อความและคำแปลยังไม่สู้บริบูรญ์เรียบร้อยดี) …". The scheduled promulgation was suspended. Instead, the King appointed a new "Revising Committee" ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P250-255.pdf Vol.35, P.35/250-255]). On 16th October 1922, the Commission of Codification decided to integrate the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" into the Book I ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol036/Vol036_P075-~~277~~.pdf Vol.36, P.36/075-077]).		* However, the scheduled promulgation was delayed. On 16th June 1922, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja'' wrote to Mr. ''Guyon;'' "[King] had once more gone through the Draft Preamble and the translation of the 387 sections of the Civil and Commercial Code which are to be promulgated and deemed that <u>''the wording and the translation are not quite perfect''</u> (ข้อความและคำแปลยังไม่สู้บริบูรญ์เรียบร้อยดี) …". The scheduled promulgation was suspended. Instead, the King appointed a new "Revising Committee" ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P250-255.pdf Vol.35, P.35/250-255]). On 16th October 1922, the Commission of Codification decided to integrate the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" into the Book I ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol036/Vol036_P075-077.pdf Vol.36, P.36/075-077]).

	=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===		=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===

Codesuser: /* B-2. Research result. */

2026-09-02T15:56:14Z

B-2. Research result.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:56, 2 September 2026
Line 20:		Line 20:
	** Pages: 35/175 – 202.		** Pages: 35/175 – 202.
	* The heading "Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II …" suggests that <u>''this report was submitted during the period where the Draft "Book on Obligations" had been already divided into "Book I" and "Book II"''</u>, and it has just <u>''decided to further separate the "Division VII. Specific Contracts" from the Book II as a new "Book III".''</u> The revising work of the "Book III" was still in process and could take a considerable time. Under such circumstances, the Committee of Codification presumably <u>''decided to promulgate only the Book I and II in advance''</u>. But, this Draft covered only Secs. 1 to 387, the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" were not integrated yet.		* The heading "Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II …" suggests that <u>''this report was submitted during the period where the Draft "Book on Obligations" had been already divided into "Book I" and "Book II"''</u>, and it has just <u>''decided to further separate the "Division VII. Specific Contracts" from the Book II as a new "Book III".''</u> The revising work of the "Book III" was still in process and could take a considerable time. Under such circumstances, the Committee of Codification presumably <u>''decided to promulgate only the Book I and II in advance''</u>. But, this Draft covered only Secs. 1 to 387, the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" were not integrated yet.
	* Before the scheduled promulgation of the Books I and II, the French commissioners summarized all the alterations and improvements to the original text of the Draft 1919. This is the contents of the report.		* Before the scheduled promulgation of the Books I and II, the French commissioners summarized all the alterations and improvements to the original text of the Draft 1919. This is the contents of the report. Its original text is as follows:

	==== '''B-2. ~~Research result.''' ====~~		<p style="margin-left:50px;"><font style='font-weight:bold; color:maroon'>Please, refer to [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P171-215.pdf The Letter and the Report of 19. October 1921 submitted by Mr. Guiyon.] 》</font></p>
	* Fortunately, we can find exactly corresponding alterations and ~~corrections in our copy of~~ the ~~Draft 1919 for most~~ of ~~these entries~~. ~~6 entries of them were not documented in our copy yet. The result is quite positive as described below in '''C-3~~. ~~Entries'''~~.

	==== '''B-3. Epilogue''' ====		==== '''B-2. Comparison Result for Authentication.''' ====
			* Fortunately, we can find exactly corresponding alterations and corrections in our copy of the Draft 1919 for most of these entries. 6 entries of them were not documented in our copy yet. The result is quite positive as described below in '''[[1919th Authentication#C-3. Entries:\|C-3. Entries]]'''. The PDF version of the result is as follows:

			<p style="margin-left:50px;"><font style='font-weight:bold; color:maroon'>Please, refer to [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_authentication.pdf The Comparison Result for Authentication in PDF.] 》</font></p>

			==== '''B-3. Epilogue.''' ====
	* The circumstances of the report suggest that <u>''our copy of the Draft 1919 show its stand shortly before the submission of the just named report "ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 ..." on 19th October 1921''</u>.		* The circumstances of the report suggest that <u>''our copy of the Draft 1919 show its stand shortly before the submission of the just named report "ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 ..." on 19th October 1921''</u>.
	* According to another document "'''Note to be communicated to the newspapers at the time when the civil and commercial code will be promulgated'''" dated March 1922 (Vol.35, P. 35/249), the promulgation of the Books I and II was scheduled to 1st April 1922 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2465), they should be then put into effect on 1st April 1923 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2466). On 21st March 1922, Mr. ''Guyon'' submitted the Thai translation of the Books I and II to the President of the Commission of Codification, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja (เจ้าะระยาอภัยราชา)''.		* According to another document "'''Note to be communicated to the newspapers at the time when the civil and commercial code will be promulgated'''" dated March 1922 ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P249.pdf Vol.35, P. 35/249]), the promulgation of the Books I and II was scheduled to 1st April 1922 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2465), they should be then put into effect on 1st April 1923 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2466). On 21st March 1922, Mr. ''Guyon'' submitted the Thai translation of the Books I and II to the President of the Commission of Codification, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja (เจ้าะระยาอภัยราชา)''.
	* However, the scheduled promulgation was delayed. On 16th June 1922, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja'' wrote to Mr. ''Guyon;'' "[King] had once more gone through the Draft Preamble and the translation of the 387 sections of the Civil and Commercial Code which are to be promulgated and deemed that <u>''the wording and the translation are not quite perfect''</u> (ข้อความและคำแปลยังไม่สู้บริบูรญ์เรียบร้อยดี) …". The scheduled promulgation was suspended. Instead, the King appointed a new "Revising Committee" (Vol.35, P.35/250-255). On 16th October 1922, the Commission of Codification decided to integrate the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" into the Book I (Vol.36, P.36/075-077).		* However, the scheduled promulgation was delayed. On 16th June 1922, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja'' wrote to Mr. ''Guyon;'' "[King] had once more gone through the Draft Preamble and the translation of the 387 sections of the Civil and Commercial Code which are to be promulgated and deemed that <u>''the wording and the translation are not quite perfect''</u> (ข้อความและคำแปลยังไม่สู้บริบูรญ์เรียบร้อยดี) …". The scheduled promulgation was suspended. Instead, the King appointed a new "Revising Committee" ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P250-255.pdf Vol.35, P.35/250-255]). On 16th October 1922, the Commission of Codification decided to integrate the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" into the Book I ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol036/Vol036_P075-277.pdf Vol.36, P.36/075-077]).

	=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===		=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===

Codesuser: /* B. Report of 19th October 1921 written by Mr. Guyon. */

2026-09-02T15:17:40Z

B. Report of 19th October 1921 written by Mr. Guyon.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 2 September 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* If we could identify any <u>''exactly corresponding descriptions of such alterations and corrections''</u> in any documents in the "Archives of the History of Thai Codification", then such documents could be evaluated as <u>''indirect evidence for the authentication of the copy''</u>.		* If we could identify any <u>''exactly corresponding descriptions of such alterations and corrections''</u> in any documents in the "Archives of the History of Thai Codification", then such documents could be evaluated as <u>''indirect evidence for the authentication of the copy''</u>.

	=== '''B. Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921 written by Mr. Guyon.''' ===		=== '''B. Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921 written by Mr. ''Guyon''.''' ===

			==== '''B-1. Overview.''' ====
	* Just a such document could be found in the Archive titled as "'''DRAFT CODE ON OBLIGATIONS, VI'''" ('''[https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:163427 Vol.35, ID=163427]'''). It was a report submitted to the "Commission of Codification" and collected under the heading:		* Just a such document could be found in the Archive titled as "'''DRAFT CODE ON OBLIGATIONS, VI'''" ('''[https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:163427 Vol.35, ID=163427]'''). It was a report submitted to the "Commission of Codification" and collected under the heading:
	** "'''III. Decision to separately promulgate the ~~Book~~ I and II (October 1921 – December 1922) and appointment by the King of a Revising Committee (June 1922''')".		** "'''III. Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II (October 1921 – December 1922) and appointment by the King of a Revising Committee (June 1922''')".
	* It has the following title and other attributes:		* It has the following title and other attributes:
	** Title: "'''ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT CODE OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 BEFORE PROMULGATION, First Part: GENERAL (Sections 1 to 387)'''"		** Title: "'''ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT CODE OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 BEFORE PROMULGATION, First Part: GENERAL (Sections 1 to 387)'''"
Line 18:		Line 19:
	** Items: 73 entries.		** Items: 73 entries.
	** Pages: 35/175 – 202.		** Pages: 35/175 – 202.
	* The heading "Decision to separately promulgate the ~~Book~~ I and II …" suggests that <u>''this report was submitted during the period where the Draft "Book on Obligations" had been already divided into "Book I" and "Book II"''</u>, and it has just <u>''decided to further separate the "Division VII. Specific Contracts" from the Book II as a new "Book III".''</u> The revising work of the "Book III" was still in process and could take a considerable time. Under such circumstances, the Committee of Codification presumably <u>''decided to promulgate only the Book I and II in advance''</u>. But, this Draft covered only Secs. 1 to 387, the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" were not integrated yet.		* The heading "Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II …" suggests that <u>''this report was submitted during the period where the Draft "Book on Obligations" had been already divided into "Book I" and "Book II"''</u>, and it has just <u>''decided to further separate the "Division VII. Specific Contracts" from the Book II as a new "Book III".''</u> The revising work of the "Book III" was still in process and could take a considerable time. Under such circumstances, the Committee of Codification presumably <u>''decided to promulgate only the Book I and II in advance''</u>. But, this Draft covered only Secs. 1 to 387, the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" were not integrated yet.
	* Before the scheduled promulgation of the ~~Book~~ I and II, the French commissioners summarized all the alterations and improvements to the original text of the Draft 1919. This is the contents of the report.		* Before the scheduled promulgation of the Books I and II, the French commissioners summarized all the alterations and improvements to the original text of the Draft 1919. This is the contents of the report.
	* Fortunately, we can find exactly corresponding alterations and corrections in our copy of the Draft 1919 for most of these entries. 6 entries of them were not documented in our copy yet. ~~This circumstance suggests~~ that <u>''our copy of the Draft 1919 show its stand shortly before the submission of the just named report "ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 ..." on 19th October 1921''</u>.
	* According to another document "Note to be communicated to the newspapers at the time when the civil and commercial code will be promulgated" dated March 1922 (Vol.35, P. 35/249), the promulgation of the ~~Book~~ I and II was scheduled to 1st April ~~1923~~ (วันที่ 1 เมษายน ~~2466~~), they should be put into effect on 1st April ~~1924~~ (วันที่ 1 เมษายน ~~2467~~). ~~Above all~~, the scheduled promulgation was		==== '''B-2. Research result.''' ====
			* Fortunately, we can find exactly corresponding alterations and corrections in our copy of the Draft 1919 for most of these entries. 6 entries of them were not documented in our copy yet. The result is quite positive as described below in '''C-3. Entries'''.

			==== '''B-3. Epilogue''' ====
			* The circumstances of the report suggest that <u>''our copy of the Draft 1919 show its stand shortly before the submission of the just named report "ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 ..." on 19th October 1921''</u>.
			* According to another document "'''Note to be communicated to the newspapers at the time when the civil and commercial code will be promulgated'''" dated March 1922 (Vol.35, P. 35/249), the promulgation of the Books I and II was scheduled to 1st April 1922 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2465), they should be then put into effect on 1st April 1923 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2466). On 21st March 1922, Mr. ''Guyon'' submitted the Thai translation of the Books I and II to the President of the Commission of Codification, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja (เจ้าะระยาอภัยราชา)''.
			* However, the scheduled promulgation was delayed. On 16th June 1922, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja'' wrote to Mr. ''Guyon;'' "[King] had once more gone through the Draft Preamble and the translation of the 387 sections of the Civil and Commercial Code which are to be promulgated and deemed that <u>''the wording and the translation are not quite perfect''</u> (ข้อความและคำแปลยังไม่สู้บริบูรญ์เรียบร้อยดี) …". The scheduled promulgation was suspended. Instead, the King appointed a new "Revising Committee" (Vol.35, P.35/250-255). On 16th October 1922, the Commission of Codification decided to integrate the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" into the Book I (Vol.36, P.36/075-077).

	=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===		=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===

	==== '''C~~. I~~. Attached Letter:''' ====		==== '''C-1. Attached Letter:''' ====
	<div style="margin-left:40px; max-width:600px; background:FloralWhite">		<div style="margin-left:40px; max-width:600px; background:FloralWhite">
	<p><font style="color:FloralWhite;">---</font></p>		<p><font style="color:FloralWhite;">---</font></p>
Line 39:		Line 46:
	</div>		</div>

	==== '''C~~. II~~. Document Title:''' ====		==== '''C-2. Document Title:''' ====
	<div style="margin-left:40px; max-width:600px; background:FloralWhite">		<div style="margin-left:40px; max-width:600px; background:FloralWhite">
	<p><font style="color:FloralWhite;">---</font></p>		<p><font style="color:FloralWhite;">---</font></p>
Line 50:		Line 57:
	</div>		</div>

	==== '''C~~. III~~. Entries:''' ====		==== '''C-3. Entries:''' ====

	===== '''"PARTS"''' =====		===== '''"PARTS"''' =====

Codesuser at 12:24, 2 September 2026

2026-09-02T12:24:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:24, 2 September 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:
	=== '''B. Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921 written by Mr. Guyon.''' ===		=== '''B. Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921 written by Mr. Guyon.''' ===

	* Just such ~~documents~~ could be found in the Archive titled as "'''DRAFT CODE ON OBLIGATIONS, VI'''" ('''[https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:163427 Vol.35, ID=163427]'''). It ~~contains~~ a following ~~set of documents~~:		* Just a such document could be found in the Archive titled as "'''DRAFT CODE ON OBLIGATIONS, VI'''" ('''[https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:163427 Vol.35, ID=163427]'''). It was a report submitted to the "Commission of Codification" and collected under the heading:
			** "'''III. Decision to separately promulgate the Book I and II (October 1921 – December 1922) and appointment by the King of a Revising Committee (June 1922''')".
			* It has the following title and other attributes:
	** Title: "'''ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT CODE OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 BEFORE PROMULGATION, First Part: GENERAL (Sections 1 to 387)'''"		** Title: "'''ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT CODE OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 BEFORE PROMULGATION, First Part: GENERAL (Sections 1 to 387)'''"
	** ~~Date~~: 18th and 19th October 1921.		** Dated: 18th and 19th October 1921.
	** Items: 73 entries.		** Items: 73 entries.
	** Pages: 35/175 – 202.		** Pages: 35/175 – 202.
	* Fortunately, we can find exactly corresponding alterations and corrections in our copy of the Draft 1919 for most of these entries. 6 entries of them were not ~~written to~~ our copy yet. This circumstance suggests that <u>''our copy of the Draft 1919 show its stand shortly before the submission of the just named report "ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 ..." on 19th October 1921''</u>.		* The heading "Decision to separately promulgate the Book I and II …" suggests that <u>''this report was submitted during the period where the Draft "Book on Obligations" had been already divided into "Book I" and "Book II"''</u>, and it has just <u>''decided to further separate the "Division VII. Specific Contracts" from the Book II as a new "Book III".''</u> The revising work of the "Book III" was still in process and could take a considerable time. Under such circumstances, the Committee of Codification presumably <u>''decided to promulgate only the Book I and II in advance''</u>. But, this Draft covered only Secs. 1 to 387, the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" were not integrated yet.
			* Before the scheduled promulgation of the Book I and II, the French commissioners summarized all the alterations and improvements to the original text of the Draft 1919. This is the contents of the report.
			* Fortunately, we can find exactly corresponding alterations and corrections in our copy of the Draft 1919 for most of these entries. 6 entries of them were not documented in our copy yet. This circumstance suggests that <u>''our copy of the Draft 1919 show its stand shortly before the submission of the just named report "ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 ..." on 19th October 1921''</u>.
			* According to another document "Note to be communicated to the newspapers at the time when the civil and commercial code will be promulgated" dated March 1922 (Vol.35, P. 35/249), the promulgation of the Book I and II was scheduled to 1st April 1923 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2466), they should be put into effect on 1st April 1924 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2467). Above all, the scheduled promulgation was

	=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===		=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, 3 September 2026
Line 20:		Line 20:
	** Pages: 35/175 – 202.		** Pages: 35/175 – 202.
	* The heading "Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II …" suggests that <u>''this report was submitted during the period where the Draft "Book on Obligations" had been already divided into "Book I" and "Book II"''</u>, and it has just <u>''decided to further separate the "Division VII. Specific Contracts" from the Book II as a new "Book III".''</u> The revising work of the "Book III" was still in process and could take a considerable time. Under such circumstances, the Committee of Codification presumably <u>''decided to promulgate only the Book I and II in advance''</u>. But, this Draft covered only Secs. 1 to 387, the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" were not integrated yet.		* The heading "Decision to separately promulgate the Books I and II …" suggests that <u>''this report was submitted during the period where the Draft "Book on Obligations" had been already divided into "Book I" and "Book II"''</u>, and it has just <u>''decided to further separate the "Division VII. Specific Contracts" from the Book II as a new "Book III".''</u> The revising work of the "Book III" was still in process and could take a considerable time. Under such circumstances, the Committee of Codification presumably <u>''decided to promulgate only the Book I and II in advance''</u>. But, this Draft covered only Secs. 1 to 387, the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" were not integrated yet.
	* Before the scheduled promulgation of the Books I and II, the French commissioners summarized all the alterations and improvements to the original text of the Draft 1919. This is the contents of the report. Its original text is as follows:		* Before the scheduled promulgation of the Books I and II, the French commissioners summarized all the alterations and improvements to the original text of the Draft 1919. This is the contents of the report. Its original text including ANNEXs I and II is as follows:

	<p style="margin-left:50px;"><font style='font-weight:bold; color:maroon'>Please, refer to [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P171-215.pdf The Letter and the Report of 19. October 1921 submitted by Mr. Guiyon.] 》</font></p>		<p style="margin-left:50px;"><font style='font-weight:bold; color:maroon'>Please, refer to [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P171-215.pdf The Letter and the Report of 19. October 1921 submitted by Mr. Guiyon.] 》</font></p>

	==== '''B-2. Comparison ~~Result~~ for Authentication.''' ====		==== '''B-2. Comparison for Authentication.''' ====
	* Fortunately, we can find exactly corresponding alterations and corrections in our copy of the Draft 1919 for most of these entries. 6 entries of them were not documented in our copy yet. ~~The~~ result is quite positive as described below in '''[[1919th Authentication#C-3. Entries:\|C-3. Entries]]'''. ~~The~~ PDF version ~~of the result~~ is as follows:		* Fortunately, we can find exactly corresponding alterations and corrections in our copy of the Draft 1919 for most of these entries; 6 entries of them were not documented in our copy yet. In this way, the result of the comparison is quite positive for the authentication of the copy of the Draft 1919 as described below in '''[[1919th Authentication#C-3. Entries:\|C-3. Entries]]'''. Its PDF version is also available as follows:

	<p style="margin-left:50px;"><font style='font-weight:bold; color:maroon'>Please, refer to [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_authentication.pdf The Comparison Result for Authentication in PDF.] 》</font></p>		<p style="margin-left:50px;"><font style='font-weight:bold; color:maroon'>Please, refer to [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_authentication.pdf The Comparison Result for Authentication in PDF.] 》</font></p>

	==== '''B-3. Epilogue.''' ====		==== '''B-3. Epilogue: Postponement of the Promulgation.''' ====
	* The circumstances of the report suggest that <u>''our copy of the Draft 1919 show its ~~stand~~ shortly before the submission of the just named report "ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 ..." on 19th October 1921''</u>.		* The circumstances of the report suggest that <u>''our copy of the Draft 1919 show its actual state shortly before the submission of the just named report "ALTERATION TO THE DRAFT OF OBLIGATIONS 1919 ..." on 19th October 1921''</u>.
	* According to another document "'''Note to be communicated to the newspapers at the time when the civil and commercial code will be promulgated'''" dated March 1922 ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P249.pdf Vol.35, P. 35/249]), the promulgation of the Books I and II was scheduled to 1st April 1922 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2465), they should be then put into effect on 1st April 1923 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2466). On 21st March 1922, Mr. ''Guyon'' submitted the Thai translation of the Books I and II to the President of the Commission of Codification, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja (เจ้าะระยาอภัยราชา)''.		* According to another document "'''Note to be communicated to the newspapers at the time when the civil and commercial code will be promulgated'''" dated March 1922 ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P249.pdf Vol.35, P. 35/249]), the promulgation of the Books I and II was scheduled to 1st April 1922 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2465), they should be then put into effect on 1st April 1923 (วันที่ 1 เมษายน 2466). On 21st March 1922, Mr. ''Guyon'' submitted <u>''the Thai translation of the Books I and II''</u> to the President of the Commission of Codification, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja (เจ้าะระยาอภัยราชา)''.
	* However, the scheduled promulgation was delayed. On 16th June 1922, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja'' wrote to Mr. ''Guyon;'' "[King] had once more gone through the Draft Preamble and the translation of the 387 sections of the Civil and Commercial Code which are to be promulgated and deemed that <u>''the wording and the translation are not quite perfect''</u> (ข้อความและคำแปลยังไม่สู้บริบูรญ์เรียบร้อยดี) …". The scheduled promulgation was suspended. Instead, the King appointed a new "Revising Committee" ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P250-255.pdf Vol.35, P.35/250-255]). On 16th October 1922, the Commission of Codification decided to integrate the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" into the Book I ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol036/Vol036_P075-077.pdf Vol.36, P.36/075-077]).		* However, the scheduled promulgation was delayed. On 16th June 1922, ''Chao Phrya Abhai Raja'' wrote to Mr. ''Guyon;'' "[King] had once more gone through the Draft Preamble and the translation of the 387 sections of the Civil and Commercial Code which are to be promulgated and deemed that <u>''the wording and the translation are not quite perfect''</u> (ข้อความและคำแปลยังไม่สู้บริบูรญ์เรียบร้อยดี) …". The scheduled promulgation was suspended. Instead, the King appointed a new "Revising Committee" ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol035/Vol035_P250-255.pdf Vol.35, P.35/250-255]).
			* In the course of the newly started revising work, on 16th October 1922, the Commission of Codification decided to integrate the sections on "Capacity of Persons" and "Juristic Persons" into the Book I ([https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol036/Vol036_P075-077.pdf Vol.36, P.36/075-077]). As a result, the volume of the Book I increased from 39 to 105 sections, and the sections of the Book II were renumbered from the range of 40 – 387 to 106 – 452.

	=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===		=== '''C. Contents of the Report of 19<sup>th</sup> October 1921.''' ===