2468th Sec 0177: Difference between revisions

From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
Newer edit →
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
(No difference)

Revision as of 14:05, 6 July 2025

มาตรา 177
  • การยื่นคำร้องขอพิสูจน์หนี้ในคดีล้มละลาย ท่านไม่นับว่าเป็นเหตุให้อายุความสดุดหยุดลง หากว่าใบพิสูจน์หนี้นั้นได้ถอนเสีย ละทิ้งเสีย หรือต้องยกเสียแล้ว

Section 177. (Draft in English from Vol.79)

  • Application to prove in bankruptcy is deemed to be no interruption if the proof is withdrawn, [abandoned] or rejected.
《References》

☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives

  1. Old Text (1923): 438 par.2 [??] [438 No.2]
  2. New Text (1992): 193/18
  3. Jp. Code (1896,98): * 152
  4. Gr. Code (1896): [214 par.2]
  5. Miscellaneous:
《Comments》

The most plausible model for this section would be:

  • Japanese Civil Code (1896,98), Art. 152:
    • Participation in bankruptcy procedure does not have the effect of interrupting prescription if the creditor cancels it or if the demand is rejected and dismissed.
Retrieved from "https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2468_th_codes/index.php?title=2468th_Sec_0177&oldid=4326"