2471th Sec 0492: Difference between revisions

From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
Created page with "===== '''ส่วนที่ ๑ ขายฝาก''' ===== '''← Previous Section''' | '''Next Section →''' ====== '''มาตรา 492''' ====== * ทรัพย์สินซึ่งขายฝากนั้น ถ้าไถ่ภายในเวลาที่กำหนดในสัญญาก็ดี หรือภายในเวลาที่กฎหม..."
 
 
Line 23: Line 23:


====== '''《Comments》''' ======
====== '''《Comments》''' ======
<u>The most plausible model</u> for this section would be:
* Japanese Civil Code (1896/98), Art.579;
** The seller of an immovable may, in accordance with a special contract for re-purchase concluded at the same time as the contract of sale, rescind the sale on returning the purchase money and the expenses of the contract paid by the purchaser. But the fruits of the immovable and the interest on the purchase money are regarded as having been set off against each other unless the parties have expressed a special intention.

Latest revision as of 14:26, 22 October 2025

← Previous Section | Next Section →

มาตรา 492
  • ทรัพย์สินซึ่งขายฝากนั้น ถ้าไถ่ภายในเวลาที่กำหนดในสัญญาก็ดี หรือภายในเวลาที่กฎหมายกำหนดไว้ก็ดี ท่านให้ถือเป็นอันว่ากรรมสิทธิ์ไม่เคยตกไปแก่ผู้ซื้อเลย

Section 492. (Draft in English from Vol.93)

  • If the property is redeemed within the period fixed by the contract or by law, its ownership is deemed to have never been vested in the buyer.
《Genealogies》
  1. Draft of 1919: Ob.430
  2. Draft of April 1924: 495
  3. Book III of January 1925: 492
《References》

☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]

  1. Fr. Code (1804): 1673(II) [??]
  2. Gr. Code (1896):
  3. Swiss Code (1911):
  4. Jp. Code (1896): * [579]
  5. English Law :
  6. Miscellaneous: Plan.II No. 1582
《Comments》

The most plausible model for this section would be:

  • Japanese Civil Code (1896/98), Art.579;
    • The seller of an immovable may, in accordance with a special contract for re-purchase concluded at the same time as the contract of sale, rescind the sale on returning the purchase money and the expenses of the contract paid by the purchaser. But the fruits of the immovable and the interest on the purchase money are regarded as having been set off against each other unless the parties have expressed a special intention.