2468th Sec 0174: Difference between revisions
From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
No edit summary |
m 1 revision imported |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 14:02, 3 August 2025
มาตรา 174
- การฟ้องคดี ท่านไม่นับว่าเป็นเหตุให้อายุความสดุดหยุดลง หากว่าคดีนั้นได้ถอนฟ้อง ละทิ้งเสีย หรือต้องยกฟ้อง
Section 174. (Draft in English from Vol.79)
- Bringing an action is deemed to be no interruption if the action is withdrawn, abandoned or dismissed.
《References》
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives
- Old Text (1923): [438 No.1]
- New Text (1992): 193/17(I)
- Jp. Code (1896,98): * 149
- Gr. Code (1896): 212 [=212 par.1]
- Miscellaneous:
《Comments》
The most plausible model for this section would be:
- Japanese Civil Code (1896,98), Art.149:
- A judicial demand does not have the effect of interruption in case the action is dismissed or withdrawn.
