2468th Sec 0347: Difference between revisions

From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
No edit summary
 
m 1 revision imported
(No difference)

Revision as of 14:03, 3 August 2025

มาตรา 347
  • ลูกหนี้คนที่สามหากได้รับคำสั่งศาลห้ามมิให้ใช้เงินแล้ว จะยกเอาหนี้ซึ่งตนได้มาภายหลังแต่นั้นขึ้นเป็นข้อต่อสู้เจ้าหนี้ผู้ที่ขอให้ยึดทรัพย์นั้น ท่านว่าหาอาจจะยกได้ไม่

Section 347. (Draft in English from Vol.79)

  • A third debtor who has received from the Court an order of prohibition of payment cannot set up against the seizing creditor an obligation subsequently acquired by him.
《References》

☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives

  1. Old Text (1923): 421
  2. Jp. Code (1896,98): * 511
  3. Gr. Code (1896): 392
  4. Miscellaneous:
《Comments》

The most plausible model for this section would be:

  • Japanese Civil Code (1896/98), Art.511;
    • A garnishee who has been prohibited by a Court from making payment cannot set up against the garnishor an obligation acquired subsequent to garnishment.