2468th Sec 0347: Difference between revisions
From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
No edit summary |
m 1 revision imported |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 14:03, 3 August 2025
มาตรา 347
- ลูกหนี้คนที่สามหากได้รับคำสั่งศาลห้ามมิให้ใช้เงินแล้ว จะยกเอาหนี้ซึ่งตนได้มาภายหลังแต่นั้นขึ้นเป็นข้อต่อสู้เจ้าหนี้ผู้ที่ขอให้ยึดทรัพย์นั้น ท่านว่าหาอาจจะยกได้ไม่
Section 347. (Draft in English from Vol.79)
- A third debtor who has received from the Court an order of prohibition of payment cannot set up against the seizing creditor an obligation subsequently acquired by him.
《References》
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives
《Comments》
The most plausible model for this section would be:
- Japanese Civil Code (1896/98), Art.511;
- A garnishee who has been prohibited by a Court from making payment cannot set up against the garnishor an obligation acquired subsequent to garnishment.
