2468th Sec 0174

From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
Revision as of 14:02, 3 August 2025 by Codesuser (talk | contribs) (1 revision imported)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
มาตรา 174
  • การฟ้องคดี ท่านไม่นับว่าเป็นเหตุให้อายุความสดุดหยุดลง หากว่าคดีนั้นได้ถอนฟ้อง ละทิ้งเสีย หรือต้องยกฟ้อง

Section 174. (Draft in English from Vol.79)

  • Bringing an action is deemed to be no interruption if the action is withdrawn, abandoned or dismissed.
《References》

☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives

  1. Old Text (1923): [438 No.1]
  2. New Text (1992): 193/17(I)
  3. Jp. Code (1896,98): * 149
  4. Gr. Code (1896): 212 [=212 par.1]
  5. Miscellaneous:
《Comments》

The most plausible model for this section would be:

  • Japanese Civil Code (1896,98), Art.149:
    • A judicial demand does not have the effect of interruption in case the action is dismissed or withdrawn.