2468th Sec 0054
From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
มาตรา 54
- ถ้าผู้ไม่อยู่นั้นได้ตั้งตัวแทนมอบอำนาจทั่วไปไว้ แต่หากการมอบอำนาจนั้นถึงที่สุดลงก็ดี หรือปรากฏว่าการที่ตัวแทนจัดทรัพย์สินนั้นเกลือกจะเสียหายแก่ผู้ไม่อยู่ก็ดี ท่านให้นำบทบัญญัติตามความในมาตราก่อนมาใช้
Section 54. (Draft in English from Vol.79)
- The foregoing section applies if an agent with general authority has been appointed by the absent person but his authority comes to an end, or it appears that his management is likely to cause injury to the absent person.
《References》
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives
- Old Text (1923): * 65
- New Text (1992): 49
- Jp. Code (1896,98): 25, [ 26]
- Gr. Code (1896): [1911]
- Miscellaneous:
《Comments》
This section would be a compound provision from two different models as follows:
- [Primary model] Old Text (1923), Sec.65:
- ถ้าผู้ไม่อยู่นั้นได้แต่งตั้งตัวแทนมอบอำนาจจัดทรัพย์สินทั่วไปแล้ว ศาลจะอนุญาตคำร้องขอซึ่งกล่าวมาในมาตราก่อนได้ต่อเมื่อมาพิจารณาเห็นปรากฏว่าการที่ตัวแทนจัดทรัพย์สินนั้นเกลือกจะเสียหายแก่ผู้ไม่อยู่
- [Secondary model] Japanese Civil Code (1896,98), Art.25:
- [I] When a person has left his ( or her) heretofore domicile or place of residence without appointing a manager for his property, the Court may, upon the demand of any person interested, or of a public procurator, order necessary measures with regard to the management of the property. The same applies when the authority of the manager ceases during the absence of the principal.
- [II] When the principal subsequently appoints a manager, the Court must, upon the demand of the manager, any person interested, or a public procurator, annul the order.
The other source is as follows:
- German Civil Code (1896), Sec.1911:
- [I] A curator absentis may be appointed for a person of full age, who is absent and whose place of residence is unknown, to take charge of his property affairs so far as is necessary. Such a curator shall also be appointed for him, even though the absent person has given a mandate or a power of agency for taking charge of his property, if circumstances have arisen which cause the revocation of the mandate or of the power of agency.
- [II] The same rule applies to an absent person whose place of residence is known, but who is prevented from returning to take charge of his property affairs.
