Sec 0174: Difference between revisions

From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
Line 5: Line 5:
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol079/vol079_0171-0174.pdf Images in Archives]
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol079/vol079_0171-0174.pdf Images in Archives]


# Old Text (1923): '''''[[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2466_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0438 438 No.1]]'''''
# Old Text (1923): ['''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2466_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0438 438 No.1]''''']
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-17 193/17(I)]'''''
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-17 193/17(I)]'''''
# Jp. Code (1896,98): *'''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter06_Title01#Article_149. 149]'''''
# Jp. Code (1896,98): * '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter06_Title01#Article_149. 149]'''''
# Gr. Code (1896): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_212. 212 [=212(I)]]'''''
# Gr. Code (1896): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_212. 212]''''' [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_212. ['''''=212(I)''''']]
# Miscellaneous:  
# Miscellaneous:  



Revision as of 13:14, 14 May 2025

มาตรา 174
  • การฟ้องคดี ท่านไม่นับว่าเป็นเหตุให้อายุความสดุดหยุดลง หากว่าคดีนั้นได้ถอนฟ้อง ละทิ้งเสีย หรือต้องยกฟ้อง
《References》

☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives

  1. Old Text (1923): [438 No.1]
  2. New Text (1992): 193/17(I)
  3. Jp. Code (1896,98): * 149
  4. Gr. Code (1896): 212 [=212(I)]
  5. Miscellaneous:
《Comments》

The most plausible model for this section would be:

  • Japanese Civil Code (1896,98), Art.149:
    • A judicial demand does not have the effect of interruption in case the action is dismissed or withdrawn.