Sec 0174: Difference between revisions
From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-17 193/17(I)]''''' | # New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-17 193/17(I)]''''' | ||
# Jp. Code (1896,98): * '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter06_Title01#Article_149. 149]''''' | # Jp. Code (1896,98): * '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter06_Title01#Article_149. 149]''''' | ||
# Gr. Code (1896): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_212. 212]''''' [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_212. ['''''=212 | # Gr. Code (1896): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_212. 212]''''' [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_212. ['''''=212 par.1''''']] | ||
# Miscellaneous: | # Miscellaneous: | ||
====== '''《Comments》''' ====== | ====== '''《Comments》''' ====== | ||
Revision as of 02:56, 20 May 2025
มาตรา 174
- การฟ้องคดี ท่านไม่นับว่าเป็นเหตุให้อายุความสดุดหยุดลง หากว่าคดีนั้นได้ถอนฟ้อง ละทิ้งเสีย หรือต้องยกฟ้อง
《References》
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives
- Old Text (1923): [438 No.1]
- New Text (1992): 193/17(I)
- Jp. Code (1896,98): * 149
- Gr. Code (1896): 212 [=212 par.1]
- Miscellaneous:
《Comments》
The most plausible model for this section would be:
- Japanese Civil Code (1896,98), Art.149:
- A judicial demand does not have the effect of interruption in case the action is dismissed or withdrawn.
