Sec 0175: Difference between revisions

From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
Line 8: Line 8:
# New Text (1992): -
# New Text (1992): -
# Jp. Code (1896,98):  
# Jp. Code (1896,98):  
# Gr. Code (1896): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_211. 211]''''' [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_211. ['''''=211(I)''''']]
# Gr. Code (1896): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_211. 211]''''' [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_211. ['''''=211 par.1''''']]
# Miscellaneous:  
# Miscellaneous:


====== '''《Comments》''' ======
====== '''《Comments》''' ======

Revision as of 02:59, 20 May 2025

มาตรา 175
  • เมื่อฟ้องยังศาลแล้ว อายุความย่อมสดุดหยุดอยู่จนกว่าคดีนั้นได้วินิจฉัยถึงที่สุด หรือเสร็จไปเป็นประการอื่น
《References》

☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives

  1. Old Text (1923): * 439
  2. New Text (1992): -
  3. Jp. Code (1896,98):
  4. Gr. Code (1896): 211 [=211 par.1]
  5. Miscellaneous:
《Comments》

This section would be a compound provision from two different models as follows:

  • [Primary model] Old Text (1923), Sec.439:
    • เมื่อฟ้องคดียังศาลแล้ว อายุความย่อมสะดุดหยุดอยู่จนกว่าจะพิพากษาคดีถึงที่สุด
  • [Secondary model] German Civil Code (1896), Sec.211:
    • [I] Interruption by bringing action continues until the case is decided or otherwise disposed of without any right of appeal.
    • [II] If the process is suspended in consequence of an agreement or because it is not prosecuted, the interruption ends with the last step in the process taken by the parties or the Court. The new prescription beginning after the termination of the interruption is interrupted by further prosecution of the process by one of the parties in the same manner as by bringing action.