Sec 0125: Difference between revisions
From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
m 1 revision imported |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# Jp. Code (1896,98): | # Jp. Code (1896,98): | ||
# Gr. Code (1896): | # Gr. Code (1896): | ||
# Miscellaneous: Br.97 | # Miscellaneous: * '''''[https://archive.org/details/cu31924024893640/page/n65/mode/2up Br.97]''''' | ||
====== '''《Comments》''' ====== | ====== '''《Comments》''' ====== | ||
<u>The most plausible model</u> for this section would be: | |||
* Civil Code of Brazil (1916), Art.97: | |||
** If both parties acted with deceit, neither of them can allege it, to annul the act, or to claim indemnity. | |||
Revision as of 16:06, 5 May 2025
มาตรา 125
- ถ้าคู่กรณีต่างได้ทำการโดยกลฉ้อฉลทั้งสองฝ่ายด้วยกัน ท่านว่าฝ่ายหนึ่งฝ่ายใดจะหยิบยกข้อฉ้อฉลนั้นอ้างเพื่อบอกล้างการนั้น หรือเพื่อเรียกค่าสินไหมทดแทนหาได้ไม่
《References》
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives
《Comments》
The most plausible model for this section would be:
- Civil Code of Brazil (1916), Art.97:
- If both parties acted with deceit, neither of them can allege it, to annul the act, or to claim indemnity.
