Sec 0179: Difference between revisions

From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
m 1 revision imported
Line 5: Line 5:
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol079/vol079_0178-0181.pdf Images in Archives]
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol079/vol079_0178-0181.pdf Images in Archives]


# Old Text (1923): '''''[[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2466_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0442 442]]'''''
# Old Text (1923): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2466_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0442 442]'''''
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-18 193/18]'''''
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-18 193/18]'''''
# Jp. Code (1896,98):  
# Jp. Code (1896,98):  
# Gr. Code (1896): *'''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_220. 220 [=220(I)]]'''''
# Gr. Code (1896): *'''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_220. 220 [=220(I)]]'''''
# Miscellaneous: Baud. Vol. 28 No.[??]


# Miscellaneous:  
====== '''《Comments》''' ======
<u>The most plausible model</u> for this section would be:


====== '''《Comments》''' ======
* German Civil Code (1896), Sec.220:
** [I] If a claim is required to be enforced before a Court of arbitration or a special tribunal, before an administrative Court or an administrative authority, the provisions of 209 to 213, 215, 216, 218, 219, apply mutatis mutandis.
** [II] If the arbitrators are not nominated in the agreement as to arbitration, or if the nomination of an arbitrator is necessary for any other reason, or if the Court of arbitration cannot be invoked until after the fulfilment of some other condition, the prescription is already interrupted by the obligee taking the steps necessary on his part for the settlement of the matter.

Revision as of 15:16, 11 May 2025

มาตรา 179
  • ในกรณีที่มอบให้อนุญาโตตุลาการพิจารณา ท่านให้ใช้บทบัญญัติมาตรา ๑๗๔ มาตรา ๑๗๕ และ ๑๗๖ บังคับอนุโลมตามควร
《References》

☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives

  1. Old Text (1923): 442
  2. New Text (1992): 193/18
  3. Jp. Code (1896,98):
  4. Gr. Code (1896): *220 [=220(I)]
  5. Miscellaneous: Baud. Vol. 28 No.[??]
《Comments》

The most plausible model for this section would be:

  • German Civil Code (1896), Sec.220:
    • [I] If a claim is required to be enforced before a Court of arbitration or a special tribunal, before an administrative Court or an administrative authority, the provisions of 209 to 213, 215, 216, 218, 219, apply mutatis mutandis.
    • [II] If the arbitrators are not nominated in the agreement as to arbitration, or if the nomination of an arbitrator is necessary for any other reason, or if the Court of arbitration cannot be invoked until after the fulfilment of some other condition, the prescription is already interrupted by the obligee taking the steps necessary on his part for the settlement of the matter.