Sec 0192: Difference between revisions
From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
m 1 revision imported |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-24 193/24]''''' | # New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-24 193/24]''''' | ||
# Jp. Code (1896,98): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter06_Title01#Article_146. 146]''''' | # Jp. Code (1896,98): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter06_Title01#Article_146. 146]''''' | ||
# Gr. Code (1896): | # Gr. Code (1896): [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_225. 225] [??], '''''[https://archive.org/details/germancivilcode01germgoog/page/166/mode/2up 768]''''' [https://archive.org/details/germancivilcode01germgoog/page/166/mode/2up ['''''=768(II)''''']] | ||
# Miscellaneous: '''''[https:// | # Miscellaneous: '''''[https://archive.org/details/codenapoleonorf00spengoog/page/612/mode/2up Fr.2220]'''''; * '''''[https://archive.org/details/cu31924024893640/page/n77/mode/2up Br.161]''''' | ||
====== '''《Comments》''' ====== | ====== '''《Comments》''' ====== | ||
<u>The most plausible model</u> for this section would be: | |||
* Civil Code of Brazil (1916), Art.161: | |||
** [I] The waiver (renuncia) of prescription may be express or tacit, and it will only be effective (só valerá) when made, without prejudice of third persons, after the prescription is consummated. | |||
** [II] The waiver is tacit when it is presumed from acts (factos) of the interested party incompatible with the prescription. | |||
The other sources are as follows: | |||
* German Civil Code (1896), Sec.768: | |||
** [I] A surety may set up all defences belonging to the principal debtor. If the principal debtor dies the surety may not avail himself of the fact that the heir has only a limited liability for the obligation. | |||
** [II] The surety does not lose a defence by reason of the fact that the principal debtor has waived it. | |||
* French Civil Code (1804), Art.2220: | |||
** Prescription cannot be renounced by anticipation ; prescription acquired may be renounced. | |||
Revision as of 13:39, 12 May 2025
มาตรา 192
- ประโยชน์แห่งอายุความนั้น จะอาจละเสียได้ต่อเมื่ออายุความครบบริบูรณ์แล้ว แต่การที่ละเสียเช่นนี้ไม่ย่อมลบล้างสิทธิของบุคคลภายนอก
- อนึ่งการที่ลูกหนี้ชั้นต้นละเสียซึ่งอายุความนั้น ย่อมไม่ลบล้างสิทธิของผู้ค้ำประกัน
《References》
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives
- Old Text (1923): 426
- New Text (1992): 193/24
- Jp. Code (1896,98): 146
- Gr. Code (1896): 225 [??], 768 [=768(II)]
- Miscellaneous: Fr.2220; * Br.161
《Comments》
The most plausible model for this section would be:
- Civil Code of Brazil (1916), Art.161:
- [I] The waiver (renuncia) of prescription may be express or tacit, and it will only be effective (só valerá) when made, without prejudice of third persons, after the prescription is consummated.
- [II] The waiver is tacit when it is presumed from acts (factos) of the interested party incompatible with the prescription.
The other sources are as follows:
- German Civil Code (1896), Sec.768:
- [I] A surety may set up all defences belonging to the principal debtor. If the principal debtor dies the surety may not avail himself of the fact that the heir has only a limited liability for the obligation.
- [II] The surety does not lose a defence by reason of the fact that the principal debtor has waived it.
- French Civil Code (1804), Art.2220:
- Prescription cannot be renounced by anticipation ; prescription acquired may be renounced.
