Sec 0138: Difference between revisions

From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
Line 10: Line 10:
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0176 176]'''''
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0176 176]'''''
# Jp. Code (1896,98): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter04_Title04#Article_121. 121]'''''
# Jp. Code (1896,98): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter04_Title04#Article_121. 121]'''''
# Gr. Code (1896): [[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter03_Title02#Section_122. 122]], *'''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter03_Title02#Section_142. 142 par.2 [=142]]'''''
# Gr. Code (1896): [[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter03_Title02#Section_122. 122]], * '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter03_Title02#Section_142. 142 par.2 [=142]]'''''
# Miscellaneous: [https://archive.org/details/cu31924024893640/page/n77/mode/2up '''''Br.158''''']
# Miscellaneous: [https://archive.org/details/cu31924024893640/page/n77/mode/2up '''''Br.158''''']


Line 16: Line 16:
This section would be <u>a compound provision from two different models</u> as follows:
This section would be <u>a compound provision from two different models</u> as follows:


* German Civil Code (1896), Sec.142:
* [Primary model] German Civil Code (1896), Sec.142:
** [I] If a voidable juristic act is avoided it is deemed to have been void ab initio.
** [I] If a voidable juristic act is avoided it is deemed to have been void ab initio.
** [II] If a person knew or ought to have known of the voidability, he is deemed, if the act is avoided, to have known that the juristic act was void.
** [II] If a person knew or ought to have known of the voidability, he is deemed, if the act is avoided, to have known that the juristic act was void.
* Civil Code of Brazil (1916), Art.158:
* [Secondary model] Civil Code of Brazil (1916), Art.158:
** When an act is annulled the parties shall be restored to the condition in which they were previously; and if it is not possible to so restore them, they shall be indemnified with an equivalent.
** When an act is annulled the parties shall be restored to the condition in which they were previously; and if it is not possible to so restore them, they shall be indemnified with an equivalent.

Revision as of 11:44, 14 May 2025

มาตรา 138
  • โมฆียะกรรม เมื่อบอกล้างแล้ว ท่านให้ถือว่าเป็นโมฆะมาแต่เริ่มแรก
  • ถ้าบุคคลใดได้รู้หรือควรจะได้รู้ว่าการใดเป็นโมฆียะ เมื่อบอกล้างแล้ว ท่านให้ถือว่าบุคคลนั้นได้รู้ว่าการนั้นไม่สมบูรณ์
  • ในการนี้ให้ผู้เป็นคู่กรณีได้กลับคืนยังฐานะเดิม และถ้าเป็นพ้นวิสัยจะให้กลับคืนเช่นนั้นได้ ก็ให้ได้รับค่าเสียหายชดใช้ให้แทน
《References》

☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives

  1. Old Text (1923): [114]
  2. New Text (1992): 176
  3. Jp. Code (1896,98): 121
  4. Gr. Code (1896): [122], * 142 par.2 [=142]
  5. Miscellaneous: Br.158
《Comments》

This section would be a compound provision from two different models as follows:

  • [Primary model] German Civil Code (1896), Sec.142:
    • [I] If a voidable juristic act is avoided it is deemed to have been void ab initio.
    • [II] If a person knew or ought to have known of the voidability, he is deemed, if the act is avoided, to have known that the juristic act was void.
  • [Secondary model] Civil Code of Brazil (1916), Art.158:
    • When an act is annulled the parties shall be restored to the condition in which they were previously; and if it is not possible to so restore them, they shall be indemnified with an equivalent.