Sec 0177: Difference between revisions

From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
Line 8: Line 8:
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-18 193/18]'''''
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-18 193/18]'''''
# Jp. Code (1896,98): * '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter06_Title01#Article_152. 152]'''''
# Jp. Code (1896,98): * '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter06_Title01#Article_152. 152]'''''
# Gr. Code (1896): ['''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_214. 214(II)]''''']
# Gr. Code (1896): ['''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_214. 214 par.2]''''']
# Miscellaneous:  
# Miscellaneous:


====== '''《Comments》''' ======
====== '''《Comments》''' ======

Revision as of 03:02, 20 May 2025

มาตรา 177
  • การยื่นคำร้องขอพิสูจน์หนี้ในคดีล้มละลาย ท่านไม่นับว่าเป็นเหตุให้อายุความสดุดหยุดลง หากว่าใบพิสูจน์หนี้นั้นได้ถอนเสีย ละทิ้งเสีย หรือต้องยกเสียแล้ว
《References》

☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives

  1. Old Text (1923): 438 par.2 [??] [438 No.2]
  2. New Text (1992): 193/18
  3. Jp. Code (1896,98): * 152
  4. Gr. Code (1896): [214 par.2]
  5. Miscellaneous:
《Comments》

The most plausible model for this section would be:

  • Japanese Civil Code (1896,98), Art. 152:
    • Participation in bankruptcy procedure does not have the effect of interrupting prescription if the creditor cancels it or if the demand is rejected and dismissed.