Sec 0192: Difference between revisions

From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
Line 9: Line 9:
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-24 193/24]'''''
# New Text (1992): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/2535_th_zhgb/index.php/Sec_0193-24 193/24]'''''
# Jp. Code (1896,98): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter06_Title01#Article_146. 146]'''''
# Jp. Code (1896,98): '''''[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_ja_zgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter06_Title01#Article_146. 146]'''''
# Gr. Code (1896): [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_225. 225] [??], '''''[https://archive.org/details/germancivilcode01germgoog/page/166/mode/2up 768]''''' [https://archive.org/details/germancivilcode01germgoog/page/166/mode/2up ['''''=768(II)''''']]
# Gr. Code (1896): [https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/1896_de_bgb/index.php/Book1_Chapter05#Section_225. 225] [??], '''''[https://archive.org/details/germancivilcode01germgoog/page/166/mode/2up 768]''''' [https://archive.org/details/germancivilcode01germgoog/page/166/mode/2up ['''''=768 par.2''''']]
# Miscellaneous: '''''[https://archive.org/details/codenapoleonorf00spengoog/page/612/mode/2up Fr.2220]'''''; * '''''[https://archive.org/details/cu31924024893640/page/n77/mode/2up Br.161]'''''
# Miscellaneous: '''''[https://archive.org/details/codenapoleonorf00spengoog/page/612/mode/2up Fr.2220]'''''; * '''''[https://archive.org/details/cu31924024893640/page/n77/mode/2up Br.161]'''''



Revision as of 03:32, 20 May 2025

มาตรา 192
  • ประโยชน์แห่งอายุความนั้น จะอาจละเสียได้ต่อเมื่ออายุความครบบริบูรณ์แล้ว แต่การที่ละเสียเช่นนี้ไม่ย่อมลบล้างสิทธิของบุคคลภายนอก
  • อนึ่งการที่ลูกหนี้ชั้นต้นละเสียซึ่งอายุความนั้น ย่อมไม่ลบล้างสิทธิของผู้ค้ำประกัน
《References》

☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives

  1. Old Text (1923): 426
  2. New Text (1992): 193/24
  3. Jp. Code (1896,98): 146
  4. Gr. Code (1896): 225 [??], 768 [=768 par.2]
  5. Miscellaneous: Fr.2220; * Br.161
《Comments》

The most plausible model for this section would be:

  • Civil Code of Brazil (1916), Art.161:
    • [I] The waiver (renuncia) of prescription may be express or tacit, and it will only be effective (só valerá) when made, without prejudice of third persons, after the prescription is consummated.
    • [II] The waiver is tacit when it is presumed from acts (factos) of the interested party incompatible with the prescription.

The other sources are as follows:

  • German Civil Code (1896), Sec.768:
    • [I] A surety may set up all defences belonging to the principal debtor. If the principal debtor dies the surety may not avail himself of the fact that the heir has only a limited liability for the obligation.
    • [II] The surety does not lose a defence by reason of the fact that the principal debtor has waived it.
  • French Civil Code (1804), Art.2220:
    • Prescription cannot be renounced by anticipation ; prescription acquired may be renounced.