Sec 0264: Difference between revisions
From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<u>The most plausible model</u> for this section would be; | <u>The most plausible model</u> for this section would be; | ||
* Japanese Civil Code (1896/98), Art.316; | * Japanese Civil Code (1896/98), Art.316; | ||
In case the lessor has received a sum of money as security for rent he has a preferential right only with regard to that part of the obligation which is not paid (performed) out of such security money. | ** In case the lessor has received a sum of money as security for rent he has a preferential right only with regard to that part of the obligation which is not paid (performed) out of such security money. | ||
Latest revision as of 13:19, 10 July 2025
มาตรา 264
- ในการเรียกร้องของผู้ให้เช่า ถ้าผู้ให้เช่าได้รับเงินประกันไว้ ผู้ให้เช่าย่อมมีบุริมสิทธิแต่เพียงในส่วนที่ไม่มีเงินประกัน
Section 264. (Draft in English from Vol.79)
- If the letter has received security money, he has a preferential right only with regard to that part of his claim which is not covered by the security money.
《References》
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives
- Old Text (1923):
- Jp. Code (1896,98): * 316
- Gr. Code (1896):
- Miscellaneous:
《Comments》
The most plausible model for this section would be;
- Japanese Civil Code (1896/98), Art.316;
- In case the lessor has received a sum of money as security for rent he has a preferential right only with regard to that part of the obligation which is not paid (performed) out of such security money.
