Sec 0054

ถ้าผู้ไม่อยู่นั้นได้ตั้งตัวแทนมอบอำนาจทั่วไปไว้ แต่หากการมอบอำนาจนั้นถึงที่สุดลงก็ดี หรือปรากฏว่าการที่ตัวแทนจัดทรัพย์สินนั้นเกลือกจะเสียหายแก่ผู้ไม่อยู่ก็ดี ท่านให้นำบทบัญญัติตามความในมาตราก่อนมาใช้

☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives

This section would be a compound provision from two different models as follows:

[Primary model] Old Text (1923), Sec.65:
- ถ้าผู้ไม่อยู่นั้นได้แต่งตั้งตัวแทนมอบอำนาจจัดทรัพย์สินทั่วไปแล้ว ศาลจะอนุญาตคำร้องขอซึ่งกล่าวมาในมาตราก่อนได้ต่อเมื่อมาพิจารณาเห็นปรากฏว่าการที่ตัวแทนจัดทรัพย์สินนั้นเกลือกจะเสียหายแก่ผู้ไม่อยู่
[Secondary model] Japanese Civil Code (1896,98), Art.25:
- [I] When a person has left his ( or her) heretofore domicile or place of residence without appointing a manager for his property, the Court may, upon the demand of any person interested, or of a public procurator, order necessary measures with regard to the management of the property. The same applies when the authority of the manager ceases during the absence of the principal.
- [II] When the principal subsequently appoints a manager, the Court must, upon the demand of the manager, any person interested, or a public procurator, annul the order.

The other source is as follows:

German Civil Code (1896), Sec.1911:
- [I] A curator absentis may be appointed for a person of full age, who is absent and whose place of residence is unknown, to take charge of his property affairs so far as is necessary. Such a curator shall also be appointed for him, even though the absent person has given a mandate or a power of agency for taking charge of his property, if circumstances have arisen which cause the revocation of the mandate or of the power of agency.
- [II] The same rule applies to an absent person whose place of residence is known, but who is prevented from returning to take charge of his property affairs.

Anonymous