2468th Sec 0206: Difference between revisions
From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== [[2468th_Book2_Chapter01_Title02_Part01|'''ส่วนที่ ๑ การไม่ชำระหนี้''']] ===== | |||
'''[[2468th Sec 0205|← Previous Section]]''' | '''[[2468th Sec 0207|Next Section →]]''' | |||
====== '''มาตรา 206''' ====== | ====== '''มาตรา 206''' ====== | ||
* ในกรณีหนี้อันเกิดแต่มูลละเมิด ลูกหนี้ได้ชื่อว่าผิดนัดมาแต่เวลาที่ทำละเมิด | * ในกรณีหนี้อันเกิดแต่มูลละเมิด ลูกหนี้ได้ชื่อว่าผิดนัดมาแต่เวลาที่ทำละเมิด | ||
Latest revision as of 14:49, 14 September 2025
← Previous Section | Next Section →
มาตรา 206
- ในกรณีหนี้อันเกิดแต่มูลละเมิด ลูกหนี้ได้ชื่อว่าผิดนัดมาแต่เวลาที่ทำละเมิด
Section 206. (Draft in English from Vol.79)
- In obligations arising from an unlawful act, the debtor is in default from the time when he committed it.
《References》
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]: Images in Archives
- Old Text (1923): * 327
- Jp. Code (1896,98):
- Gr. Code (1896): 848 [??]
- Miscellaneous: Br.962; Fr.1302 [??]
《Comments》
The most plausible model for this section would be:
- Old Text (1923), Sec.327;
- บุคคลเป็นหนี้อันเกิดโดยละเมิด ชื่อว่าผิดนัดแต่เวลากระทำละเมิดเสียแล้ว ไม่พักจะต้องทวงถามก่อนเลย
The other miscellaneous sources are as follows:
- Civil Code of Brazil (1916), Art.962;
- In obligations arising from crime (delicto), the debtor is considered in default from the time that he perpetrated it.
- French Civil Code (1804), Art.1302;
- [I] When the certain and determinate property which was the object of the obligation happens to perish, is put out of traffic, or is lost in such manner that its existence is absolutely unknown, the obligation is extinguished if the thing have perished, or have been lost without the fault of the debtor, and before he have been in delay.
- [II] Even when the debtor is in delay, and if he have not been charged with fortuitous occurrences, the obligation is extinguished in the case where the thing would equally have perished at the house of the creditor if it had been delivered to him.
- [III] The debtor is bound to prove the fortuitous occurrence which he alleges.
- [IV] In whatsoever manner a thing stolen have perished, or have been lost, its loss does not exonerate him who has removed it from restitution of the price.
