2471th Sec 0532: Difference between revisions
From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
Created page with "=== '''ลักษณะ ๓ ให้''' === '''← Previous Section''' | '''Next Section →''' ====== '''มาตรา 532''' ====== * ทายาทของผู้ให้อาจเรียกให้ถอนคืนการให้ได้แต่เฉพาะในเหตุที่ผู้รับได้ฆ่าผู้ให้ตายโดยเจตนาแล..." |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
====== '''《References》''' ====== | ====== '''《References》''' ====== | ||
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […] | ☆ quoted from “INDEX” ('''→[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol054/idx/vol054_p103.pdf Original Table in Vol.54]''') with supplementary entries in […] | ||
# Fr. Code (1804): '''''[957(II)]''''' | # Fr. Code (1804): '''''[[https://archive.org/details/codenapoleonorf00spengoog/page/860/mode/2up 957(II)]]''''' | ||
# Gr. Code (1896): * '''''[[1896de_Book2_Chapter07_Title02#Section_530.|530]]''''', [[1896de_Book2_Chapter07_Title02#Section_531.|531]] | # Gr. Code (1896): * '''''[[1896de_Book2_Chapter07_Title02#Section_530.|530]]''''', [[1896de_Book2_Chapter07_Title02#Section_531.|531]] | ||
# Swiss Code (1911): | # Swiss Code (1911): | ||
# Jp. Code (1896): | # Jp. Code (1896): | ||
# English Law : | # English Law: | ||
# Miscellaneous: | # Miscellaneous: | ||
====== '''《Comments》''' ====== | ====== '''《Comments》''' ====== | ||
<u>The most plausible model</u> for this section would be: | |||
* German Civil Code (1896): Sec. 530; | |||
** [I] A gift may be revoked if the donee renders himself guilty of gross ingratitude by any serious misconduct towards the donor or a near relation of the donor. | |||
** [II] The right to revoke belongs to the heir of the donor only if the donee has wilfully and unlawfully killed the donor, or prevented him from revoking. | |||
Another relevant source is as follows: | |||
* French Civil Code (1804), Art. 957; | |||
** [I] The petitions for revocation on account of ingratitude ought to be made within the year, to be computed from the date of the crime imputed by the donor to the donee, or from the date at which the crime might have been known to the donor. | |||
** [II] Such revooition is not allowed to be petitioned for by the donor against the heirs of the donee nor by the heirs of the donor against the donee, unless in the last case the action have been instituted by the donor, or unless he have died within a year after the crime. | |||
Latest revision as of 14:06, 8 August 2026
← Previous Section | Next Section →
มาตรา 532
- ทายาทของผู้ให้อาจเรียกให้ถอนคืนการให้ได้แต่เฉพาะในเหตุที่ผู้รับได้ฆ่าผู้ให้ตายโดยเจตนาและไม่ชอบด้วยกฎหมาย หรือได้กีดกันผู้ให้ไว้มิให้ถอนคืนการให้
- แต่ว่าผู้ให้ได้ฟ้องคดีไว้แล้วอย่างใดโดยชอบ ทายาทของผู้ให้จะว่าคดีอันนั้นต่อไปก็ได้
Section 532. (Draft in English from Vol.93)
- [I] The heir of the donor can claim revocation only if the donee has intentionally and unlawfully killed the donor or prevented him from revoking the gift.
- [II] However, the heir may continue an action which has been duly entered by the donor.
《Genealogies》
《References》
☆ quoted from “INDEX” (→Original Table in Vol.54) with supplementary entries in […]
- Fr. Code (1804): [957(II)]
- Gr. Code (1896): * 530, 531
- Swiss Code (1911):
- Jp. Code (1896):
- English Law:
- Miscellaneous:
《Comments》
The most plausible model for this section would be:
- German Civil Code (1896): Sec. 530;
- [I] A gift may be revoked if the donee renders himself guilty of gross ingratitude by any serious misconduct towards the donor or a near relation of the donor.
- [II] The right to revoke belongs to the heir of the donor only if the donee has wilfully and unlawfully killed the donor, or prevented him from revoking.
Another relevant source is as follows:
- French Civil Code (1804), Art. 957;
- [I] The petitions for revocation on account of ingratitude ought to be made within the year, to be computed from the date of the crime imputed by the donor to the donee, or from the date at which the crime might have been known to the donor.
- [II] Such revooition is not allowed to be petitioned for by the donor against the heirs of the donee nor by the heirs of the donor against the donee, unless in the last case the action have been instituted by the donor, or unless he have died within a year after the crime.
