2471th Sec 0496: Difference between revisions

From Thai Codification Codes of 1925
No edit summary
 
Line 11: Line 11:
# Draft of 1919: '''''[[1919th_Book1_Division07_Title01_Chapter04_Part01#Section_435.|Ob.435]]'''''
# Draft of 1919: '''''[[1919th_Book1_Division07_Title01_Chapter04_Part01#Section_435.|Ob.435]]'''''
# Draft of April 1924: '''''[[1924th_Book3_Title01_Chapter04_Part01#Section_500.|500]]'''''
# Draft of April 1924: '''''[[1924th_Book3_Title01_Chapter04_Part01#Section_500.|500]]'''''
# Book III of January 1925: '''''[[2467th_Sec_0496|496]]'''''
# Book III of January 1925: '''''[[2467th_Sec_0496|496]]''''' ('''→[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol054/rev/vol054_0494-0498.pdf Record of Revision in Vol.54]''')


====== '''《References》''' ======
====== '''《References》''' ======
☆ quoted from “INDEX” with supplementary entries in […]
☆ quoted from “INDEX” ('''→[https://openlegaltextbook.ddns.net/Codes/archives/vol054/idx/vol054_p101.pdf Original Table in Vol.54]''') with supplementary entries in […]
# Fr. Code (1804): '''''[https://archive.org/details/codenapoleonorf00spengoog/page/458/mode/2up <nowiki>[1661]</nowiki>]''''', 5061 [??]
# Fr. Code (1804): '''''[https://archive.org/details/codenapoleonorf00spengoog/page/458/mode/2up <nowiki>[1661]</nowiki>]''''', 5061 [??]
# Gr. Code (1896):  
# Gr. Code (1896):  

Latest revision as of 15:58, 7 May 2026

← Previous Section | Next Section →

มาตรา 496
  • ถ้าในสัญญามีกำหนดเวลาไถ่ต่ำกว่าสิบปีหรือสามปีไซร้ ท่านว่าหาอาจจะขยายเวลานั้นในภายหลังได้ไม่

Section 496. (Draft in English from Vol.93)

  • If a shorter period than ten years or three years is provided in the contract, the time cannot be afterwards extended.
《Genealogies》
  1. Draft of 1919: Ob.435
  2. Draft of April 1924: 500
  3. Book III of January 1925: 496 (Record of Revision in Vol.54)
《References》

☆ quoted from “INDEX” (Original Table in Vol.54) with supplementary entries in […]

  1. Fr. Code (1804): [1661], 5061 [??]
  2. Gr. Code (1896):
  3. Swiss Code (1911):
  4. Jp. Code (1896): * 580[(II)]
  5. English Law :
  6. Miscellaneous:
《Comments》

The most plausible model for this section would be:

  • Japanese Civil Code (1896/98), Art.580;
    • [I] The period of time for re-purchase cannot exceed ten years. If a longer period of time is fixed, it is to be reduced to ten years.
    • [II] If a period of time for re-purchase is once fixed, it cannot be afterwards prolonged.
    • [III] When there is no fixed period of time for re-purchase it must be effected within five years.

The other source is as follows:

  • French Civil Code (1804), Art.1661;
    • The term fixed is imperative, and must not be prolonged by the judge.